Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Jean Gousse
  • Rental Property Investor
0
Votes |
2
Posts

What would you guys do? (Investing in NY)

Jean Gousse
  • Rental Property Investor
Posted

Trying to get my 1st property in Queens NY. I’m trying to figure out if the property would produce cash flow.

Using the 2% rule, I got 0.69%

The 50% rule, I got negative cash flow

ROI, I got 4.06%

I know those numbers are extremely low, and also know the New York REM should treated differently, but the house is in a great area and those number should be significantly higher after the 1st year or 2. I’d like to know you guys opinion.

Thank you

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,385
Posts
19,417
Votes
Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
  • Plymouth, MI
19,417
Votes |
13,385
Posts
Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
  • Plymouth, MI
Replied

REI job is to make money, not collect trophies ("...but the house is in a great ...").

"Should be..., "could be...", "in the future...", etc... "...will fix the current situation...", are all rationalizations for a bad deal.  Either it is now, or it isn't now, a good deal.

Why and how should the NY REM be treated different?  Are you saying that profits/cash flow are somehow not as important in NY?

Loading replies...