Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
3
Votes
Matt Stevi
  • Orange County, CA
3
Votes |
17
Posts

Deal Criteria Too Stringent?

Matt Stevi
  • Orange County, CA
Posted

Hey all,

New to the real estate investing world as of a couple of months ago. Quick question about my criteria when analyzing deals.

I like to be SUPER conservative when running the numbers on a deal and so I've taken it so far as to factor in 10% of the rent EACH when accounting for vacancy, repair, CapEx, and property management. So, for example: say rent is $1000, I'd be setting aside $100 each for all 4 of those categories ($400 total, not including the mortgage payment, property taxes, insurance, any utilities, etc.)

Is it possible to find a property that will still cash flow and have a good cash on cash return (like 8%+)? I'm asking because I haven't found one yet using this criteria, so now I'm starting to think I should be a little more lenient with my numbers.

Thanks for your help!

Matt

    Loading replies...