Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

19
Posts
4
Votes
Andrew Lawrence
  • Tacoma, WA
4
Votes |
19
Posts

Analyzing markets based on MSA or City or County

Andrew Lawrence
  • Tacoma, WA
Posted

Which is the most accurate in determining how well a target market is doing economically as far as number of jobs and job growth is concerned? Does looking at MSA numbers or county numbers or city numbers reflect a better picture? 

(if it helps specify my question I would consider purchasing outside of the target primary market of the big metro areas and rather look at surrounding areas as it seems the purchase price to cash flow ratio is higher just outside of the big metro areas).