Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

73
Posts
50
Votes
Thomas J. Clifford
  • Gainesville, FL
50
Votes |
73
Posts

LEVERAGING TARGET: What should my downpayment be?

Thomas J. Clifford
  • Gainesville, FL
Posted

I'm leaving the newbie RE investor phase of education and gearing up to look for my first purchase/purchases. I plan to do another 30 year refi on my primary residence and walk away with slightly smaller monthly payment, but using the cash-out of $168k as purchase capital.

I know there is a debate regarding buying an investment property in full vs buying properties with leverage, but I'm having trouble pinpointing a good place to work out pros/cons on which avenue to pursue.

A) What pros/cons do you know of to buying one property in full to obtain a higher monthly cash flow?
B) If I opt for buying more properties under conventional loans - would you recommend higher down-payments and fewer properties or go all out and snatch up as many deals as I can?

I'm leaning toward B unless there is something about A that I didn't consider, and I'm thinking of leaving about 25-30k for each leveraged property for repairs/reserves. Does that sound reasonable, or is that still too ? What recommendations do you have? Maybe not handle these purchases each at the same time, but stagger them out?

I appreciate any insights. Thanks in advance!

T.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,876
Posts
2,466
Votes
Jaysen Medhurst
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Greenwich, CT
2,466
Votes |
4,876
Posts
Jaysen Medhurst
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Greenwich, CT
Replied

@Thomas J. Clifford, this comes up a lot on BP, so it's worth your time to research what else has been written.

Short answer: leverage allows you to scale faster and multiplies your returns at the "cost" of more risk and restrictions (e.g., meeting lender underwriting requirements).

Something to keep in mind: you can buy cash and then finance later. This is the best of both worlds. 

A few other thoughts:

  • No leverage means higher cash flow, but your ROI will be greatly diminished. You're not "making" cash flow, you've "bought" it. Don't confuse the two. You also miss out out on one of the four REI money makers: mortgage pay down.
  • A property should cash flow well with 75% LTV.
  • $25-30k of reserves for each property is probably way too much, assuming you're looking at SFR or small MFR. A few grand per unit is good and then put ~15% of rents aside for repairs and CapEx.
  • Jaysen Medhurst
  • Loading replies...