Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

161
Posts
75
Votes
Wei Jie Yang
  • New York City
75
Votes |
161
Posts

Sequence of Rental property Purchase

Wei Jie Yang
  • New York City
Posted

Hi guys,

Looking for advice on the topic of sequencing house purchases.  I have Purchased two rentals so far. Should close on two more by end of July.  I've so far limited my purchases of $100K+ SFH, that can rent for $1000+ that I hope can appreciate over time due to them (mostly) t being in good/path of progress areas.   Now I'm at a point where I am thinking whether I should aim for more expensive or more affordable housing stock.

With conventional loans as of this week, I am able to do 15% down and 5% interest rates with no points. It seems like a waste to have terms that good for a property that is 60K-90K,m even if COC% are better. I'd rather get a 120-200K property that cash flows and I would save and focus properties on that level until all 10 (or 20 if my wife goes back to work).

I can look to the 60-90k houses once I get pass my Fannie/Freddie slots and have to resort to portfolio loans. Since Portfolio loans typically needs a higher downpayment as well as higher interest rates a cheaper house strategy then will be much more efficient then doing now. 

Does that line of thinking make sense if i am mostly aiming for cashflow (with a bit of appreciation down the line)? Is there any flaw in this strategy (other than speed of scale?) 

Loading replies...