Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

21
Posts
1
Votes
Jason Vazquez
  • Property Manager
  • San Diego, CA
1
Votes |
21
Posts

Cost Efficient Post Cards

Jason Vazquez
  • Property Manager
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Hey everyone. I'm just getting started on my marketing for deals, and trying to set up a cost and time efficient way to market to my list of 1,005 absentee owners. So far it looks as if the best price I can come up with for mailing one post card to my entire list is about $475, which comes out to about $.47 a post card. I have read an article about ordering through a print shop and using their mail permit (dropping the price per mailer to $0.12!), but the article is about saturating one particular neighborhood with post cards, whereas I am mailing to an absentee owners list with people all over the place. Have you guys ever heard of such an option to save money on postage but that allows you to mail to specific and widely dispersed addresses?

the article I'm referencing: http:[REMOVED]

Loading replies...