Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago,

User Stats

209
Posts
57
Votes
William Huston
  • Trinity, FL
57
Votes |
209
Posts

50 Units, 200/Month Income: Huh?

William Huston
  • Trinity, FL
Posted

Hello All, 

I own rentals by sheer just purchasing at different duty stations i was stationed at over the years and keeping them, but now im really trying to learn the knowledge to step up my investing in real estate. 

Today i was riding my bicycle and listening to a bigger pockets podcast and the person in the podcast mentioned that his goal is to get to 50 units and with all those units to at least net $200/month total passive cash flow to cover his living expense and retire..... 

I feel like i am missing something here.. i would understand it and agree with his statement if it was $200 per unit a month, meaning $10,000/month, but i listened to it more than once and it didn't sound like he meant it this way. 

Thanks in advance for explaining it to me, im just trying to understand and maybe there is something im missing that im overlooking. 

Loading replies...