Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Hasnain Akram
  • AUSTIN, TX
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Growing number of properties

Hasnain Akram
  • AUSTIN, TX
Posted

I have a basic newbie question about growing the number of properties I own. I own one SFH which is slightly cash-flow positive, and based on savings and income from other sources, I can likely tolerate a few months of vacancy. However, if I expand to, say, 3 or more properties, or even multi-family, there's likely no way I can foot the monthly payments if all homes/units were to become vacant at the same time. So how to avoid this risk while still growing my real estate portfolio? Or is it unavoidable and am I just hedging on multiple properties not becoming vacant simultaneously?

It seems to me that growth without significant equity already in place in a portfolio comes at the expense of risk from over-leveraging, unless I'm missing something. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,926
Posts
12,725
Votes
Replied

The more doors you have lowers the financial risk of vacancies. Because more doors creates greater cash flow and multiple vacancies is uncommon you are actually more financially secure when they do occur.

It is the same as owning a SFH or a multi. A vacancy in a sfh is a 100% loss of income, a vacancy in a multi may only be 25% loss of income. The reality is that vacancies are not as big of a deal that small landlords make of it. It's mostly fear mongering.

The more doors the greater your financial security. If you fear risk do not invest.

Loading replies...