Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

83
Posts
17
Votes
Cody Jensen
  • Colonia, NJ
17
Votes |
83
Posts

Buying a property in a flood zone and insurance

Cody Jensen
  • Colonia, NJ
Posted

Hey Guys,

Is buying a investment property in a flood zone a bad idea?


Do you currently own a property in a flood zone ? If so, how much are you paying for flood insurance? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,714
Posts
1,554
Votes
Lynn McGeein
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Virginia Beach, VA
1,554
Votes |
2,714
Posts
Lynn McGeein
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Virginia Beach, VA
Replied

My flood insurance has more than doubled since I bought my property in 2009 thanks to the weird flood insurance market"fixes."  When I bought the home, I was told that the subsidized ones may be affected in the future, but not the ones that aren't subsidized, so I didn't have to worry as my rates already took the full risk into effect.  That was false.  They decided to charge investors more so subsidized owner-occupants could continue to pay less.  I would still consider property in a flood zone, but only if it was a good enough deal that I could pay cash and not worry about lender-required insurance.    

Loading replies...