Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago,

User Stats

5
Posts
3
Votes
Mary O.
  • Seattle, WA
3
Votes |
5
Posts

buying out of state/non-local property

Mary O.
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

Hello everyone, I live in an outrageously expensive HCOL city (Seattle) but I want to invest in RE.  My 80k isn't going to go far here. So I'm looking elsewhere in the NW and out of state.  Is it a bad idea to do this?  I just sold my first rental but that was in town/driving distance so I was doing the maintenance when necessary. It was also relatively new construction so not much maintenance to deal with.

Is long distance a no-no for someone starting like me?

Loading replies...