Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

10
Posts
5
Votes
James Bird
  • Vernal, UT
5
Votes |
10
Posts

To rent (to myself) or not to rent

James Bird
  • Vernal, UT
Posted

I bought a 4 bed 2 bath split-entry foreclosure 2 years ago as my first home (and still live there). I'm currently closing on my second single family and looking for a 3rd, so I set up the LLC, bank accounts, etc.

My current payment is in the 700 range and it would rent in the 1000 range. I want to use it as a rental as soon as it makes sense but that could be a few years out, hopefully sooner. I'm asking myself, why not switch now and rent to myself so it will be ready when the time comes? Also benefit from the tax advantages, improvements costs, asset protection, and start depreciation now? I plan to do everything legally (if this is legal) with rental contracts and proper paper trail.

If YES, would it make sense to rent at my mortgage rate or standard rate?

I haven't ran all of the numbers yet, so if this is nonsense please shoot me straight. I'm unfortunately still in the beginner stages and trying to find the best ways to move forward.

Thanks in advance.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

204
Posts
168
Votes
Paul Caputo
  • Cost Segregation Specialist
  • Naperville, IL
168
Votes |
204
Posts
Paul Caputo
  • Cost Segregation Specialist
  • Naperville, IL
Replied

I'd highly recommend consulting with real estate and tax professionals before doing anything like this. 

Technically you could rent to yourself by selling the property to a wholly owned entity and then renting it from that entity. You would have to pay fair market rent to the entity or it would be considered personal use and it wouldn't be a rental. This isn't that great of an idea since all the rent you paid to the entity would be taxable income, so you'd have to pay taxes on the rent you paid. Do you want to pay $12K per year in housing cost and add $12K to your taxable income at the same time? As opposed to paying $8,400 per year and not adding to taxable income? 

You would also lose any tax benefits you have from owning the home, so there's that too. If it's your residence you can get an exemption on capital gains up to $250K when you actually sell it down the road, that's not the case when you sell the rental: you have to pay depreciation recapture and capital gains. 

The other thing here is that is an unusual situation. The IRS doesn't like unusual situations, they give them a reason to take another look. They allow the rules for rental property because it is an income producing business. Living at your own house isn't exactly a business is it? 

So can you do this? Yeah. Should you? No. 

Loading replies...