Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Jack Lundholm
  • Davis, CA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Buying First Rental Property out of State. What areas are best?

Jack Lundholm
  • Davis, CA
Posted

Hello, 

I have been considering making an out-of-state investment in real estate for some time-- in part because of the prices in my area (CA). I am not looking to do wholesaling or flipping, but rather invest in rental properties. I have spent months looking at a few specific areas and was hoping to get some feedback from the pros (or at least, someone who knows the areas in question). 

The first area I was looking at is metro Detroit. I know its reputation well, but it still provides an interesting opportunity with good cash-flow and high cap rates. I am not at all concerned for my personal safety while traveling in Detroit, but rather the damage that scavengers could do to a property if there was ever a vacancy. The other concern I have is finding insurance for the house, given Detroit's somewhat notorious reputation it seems like it may be a struggle to insure just one rental property. 

The second area I am particularly interested in is the Rochester N.Y. area, especially properties around the university. Obviously, there are complications in this too, as students can, at times, be destructive to a property; however, I doubt they would steal the copper piping or do anything deleterious to that extent (you never know, though). Of course, there are other areas in N.Y that are also interesting, such as Albany and Syracuse-- though I have not done nearly as much research into those areas. 

I would like to keep the actual purchase price of the house around 30-40k. Sticking in this price range would allow me to budget for some necessary remodeling, and have a cash reserve set aside to cover future damages. I would not be taking a loan out to pay for the house, it would be a cash deal. I would also plan on doing the remodeling myself, as I am quite well proficient at working on projects of this nature. 

My quandary comes down to the main principal of real estate: Location, Location, Location. Which one provides a safer bet for cash flow and stable renters?  Any advice at all would be greatly appreciated. 

Loading replies...