Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16
Posts
4
Votes
Jama Mohamed
  • Los Angeles, CA
4
Votes |
16
Posts

House-hack or buy investment property and rent?

Jama Mohamed
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hi all,

So I'm starting to get into real estate investing and have come across a problem that I'm sure many of you have had. Basically, whether to buy a house to live in and rent rooms out of or to buy a property somewhere and rent the entire thing out while living somewhere else. Here are some details-

I currently live in Los Angeles, California (Pasadena area) and am renting an apartment. I like the area and would love to own a home around here, but as you know the costs can be prohibitively high. I was so excited about the prospect of getting a house here and living in the area that I decided to go get approved for a bank loan and ended up figuring out that I can afford something in the $700k range with is barely enough to get something decent here. Since then I've been looking at deals with my real estate agent and have figured something odd out...

The cash ROI here is AWFUL, and by awful I mean negative negative negative. A 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom house might go for around $650k or so here and the average rents are around $1k/room or $2.2k for the full house. Doing the math and best case I'm down $1.5k/month with losses for the next 10 years (WOW). Total ROI is not positive either for that kind of deal!

So I'm just thinking, holy **** this is awful. Why would anybody buy a house around here? Am I missing something?

So now I'm starting to wonder, should I approach this from a different angle and instead buy an out of state property in a place that actually cashflows with renters. I really do want to buy/live in a house, but I'm not going to make a decision based on what looks shiny to me at the moment. And unfortunately buying a house here just looks like that kind of shiny stone...

Does anybody have experience with this or pointers you could give me? I'm really trying to figure all of this out! Thank you!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,770
Posts
3,665
Votes
Aaron Mazzrillo
  • Investor
  • Riverside, CA
3,665
Votes |
2,770
Posts
Aaron Mazzrillo
  • Investor
  • Riverside, CA
Replied

Where the market is right now in SoCal it is no longer a cash flow game. You missed that boat. It was moored to the dock from 2009-2011, but that ship has sailed. Now it is a capture the equity game. You buy as low as you can and either flip it, or hold it for 1-2 years, hopefully enjoy some appreciation, then flip it and cash out the captured equity. 

That does not mean you pay market value and hope it goes up. You buy well below market value, but you're not going to get that working with your agent.

Loading replies...