Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

13
Posts
4
Votes
Sean Youngberg
  • Investor
  • Maryville, TN
4
Votes |
13
Posts

Finished basement SqFt for comps

Sean Youngberg
  • Investor
  • Maryville, TN
Posted

Hello BP!

I'm getting a little confused about how to handle finished basement sq. ft. when comparing properties. I'm currently trying to do a CMA for a property with no basement vs one with a 500 sq. ft finished basement. The listing sites are also confusing, as I thought that under-ground living spaces were not supposed to be included in the total sq. ft. However, on Redfin, Truila, etc. they look to be included and used in the $/sq. ft calculation.

For example, check out this listing, there are 1610 main level and 506 finished basement but both are included in the total sq. ft. Is this normal?

The CMA spreadsheet I am using breaks down to the adjusted $/sq. ft. And gives a estimated value of the target property based on that number*sq. ft. When comparing those with finished basements, I pulled the basement sq. ft. out separately but that is really skewing my numbers.

In general, it certainly seems like buyers are paying around the same $/sq. ft of finished basement vs above ground. And even the listings seem to not differentiate.