Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 16 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

133
Posts
10
Votes
Matthew Green
  • Contractor
  • Niagara Falls/Buffalo, NY
10
Votes |
133
Posts

Good Idea: R.E License???

Matthew Green
  • Contractor
  • Niagara Falls/Buffalo, NY
Posted

Hello

I am now taking a real estate licensing course in NY in hopes of gaining an introductory knowledge about the business. Is this a good idea if my aspirations are to invest and rehab properties? And do the binding laws of being an agent hinder any RE investment practices?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,749
Posts
10,947
Votes
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
10,947
Votes |
15,749
Posts
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
ModeratorReplied
Originally posted by Mark:
there's nothing wrong with being an agent and investor. It seems that the people who aren't agents and are investors are the ones who say it's NOT recommended, but yet they don't have any substance to back up their advice either.
I never stated that there is something wrong with having a license as an investor. What I did say is that there are adbatages and disadvantages. You then proceed to claim that I and others without a re sales license do not recommend it without any substance to back it up. Not sure that is called for but here is my substance to clear the air.

Disadvantages:
1. RE sales licensees are held to a high "professional" standard and if anything goes wrong, you can be blamed as you are under a ton of disclosure laws and regulations. As ONLY an investor, I am not. This does NOT mean I act in an unethical or illegal manner so please don't go there.
2. Licensees are required to pay a lot of fees, especially here in CA. This adds to the cost of being an investor.
3. Motivated sellers may not want to speak with you as they may feel as an agent, you are only attempting to get another listing.
4. As an agent, you can't pay bird dog fees, marketing fees, etc or anything outside of a HUD 1 without risking your license. I can do all of those things and more.
5. Due to your enormous regulations associated with a sales license, you are required to use company contracts, disclosures, forms, etc and I can use them or use my own, or none at all as the case may be.

I am sure there are more, but those are some that come to mind.

Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? That is up to each person to determine for their specific needs and agendas. Have I missed out on 3% & 6% commissions? Of course! I would love to have them and direct access to MLS, but I have also done deals I may not have been able to with a license.

Loading replies...