Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
1
Votes
Chui O.
1
Votes |
11
Posts

Investing in RE without owning primary residence

Chui O.
Posted

Hi all, 

We are currently renting and since houses/location that we would like to live in are priced beyond our reach for now, I would like to just jump straight into investing in other more affordable areas around us. 

Are there any disadvantages to my plan that I should further consider? Such as, in terms of taxes or getting loans, any tax disadvantages to not owning a primary residence? Is it harder to get loans if the banks know we are buying for investment as opposed to primary residence?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,663
Posts
3,093
Votes
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
3,093
Votes |
2,663
Posts
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
Replied

Buying a primary residence with the intention of later turning it into a rental is the lowest risk way to learn the ropes in my opinion. You are essentially your own tenant, your own contractor, and your own property manager in the beginning, and that is a great, low risk way to learn hands on. You don't have to buy your dream home in your dream location as a first property ... this concept seems to have been lost over time, but back in the day there used to be this great concept of a starter home, which was a place to sacrifice a bit, learn the ropes, and build up to your dreams.

On the other hand, you could buy a rental 1st, but that would be much riskier in my opinion since you would not have as solid of a base of hands on experience or financial base as you would by buying your primary first and then turn it into a rental to buy your next home later.

I speak from experience, and now have a nice portfolio of cash flowing single family homes in nice neighborhoods in Southern California. If I can do it, then you can do it!

Loading replies...