Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago,

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Eli Tafesse
  • Queen Creek, AZ
0
Votes |
2
Posts

How to tell if properties in your areas are renting?

Eli Tafesse
  • Queen Creek, AZ
Posted

I've been checking online into a specific zip code and when looking up rental houses in this zip code I find that a lot of them say: "200 days ago" "65 days ago" "52 days ago" "263 days ago" etc. Does this mean these properties are just sitting there with no tenants for that long? And does that then mean that buy and hold in this zip code just wouldn't work because the properties here don't rent well? I'd appreciate any feedback, thanks in advance. 

This is my first post so if this is a silly question forgive me. (Or if there's already a post or blog about this feel free to link it and call me lazy for not finding it myself.)

Loading replies...