Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

40
Posts
1
Votes
Mariama R.
  • Washington, DC
1
Votes |
40
Posts

Investing in Old, Large Victorian Homes in Cleveland, Ohio

Mariama R.
  • Washington, DC
Posted

Hello: I've heard that investing in Large Victorian Homes in Cleveland, Ohio by rehabbing them and renting them out to section 8 tenants generates much positive cashflow. However, how does one generate positive cashflow when one must contend with heating large houses, the upkeep of old and large Victorian Homes and rehabbing them? Also, can an investor guard against houses in C or D neigbhorhoods of Cleveland being vandalized and stripped of valuables, such as the furnaces, electrical wiring, etc. before the house(s) are even rented out to tenants? Is this another cost that must be calculated into cashflow analysis? How does an investor guard against vandalism of properties? Thank you

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,280
Posts
3,064
Votes
Michaela G.
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
3,064
Votes |
3,280
Posts
Michaela G.
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
Replied

Personally, I would not suggest to start off with Victorians, especially, if they're for section 8 tenants. 

I have done  major renovation (no such think as basic fix up for a Victorian) on a dozen Historic homes, that had all been bypassed by other investors.

You're dealing with +100 years of various owners patching over problems. You don't know what you get until you start tearing down walls and ceilings. I've done done a rehab under 75K, even if I had thought I'd get away with less. 

A lot of the basic system installations may be more than other homes. Wiring has to be fished through walls, that are often lath and plaster, possibly covered with a layer of sheetrock (or not). HVAC ductwork has to be worked in somewhere. You have crawlspaces, that may be very difficult to access by any plumber that's not skinny ;-). Roofs my have many, many layers of tiles above cedar shakes, which will need total tear-off and decking. And if the building inspector sees the roof open, he may find that the roof joists don't meet today's code (even though the roof survived for +100 years) and may make you add extra support. 

There are always surprises, that you didn't think about. 

So, my suggestion is to not start off with the most difficult type of rehab.

Loading replies...