Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
0
Votes
Robert Britton
  • Software Engineer
  • Boulder, CO
0
Votes |
7
Posts

SF or somewhere else?

Robert Britton
  • Software Engineer
  • Boulder, CO
Posted

I've recently moved to the SF Bay Area for work and am very interested in getting involved as a passive real estate investor. The downside is that it is a very expensive market, and I don't have a lot of capital. I'm here for at least 2 years, so I'm trying to decide between two options:

1) Save up some cash, then move to another city where my capital can go a lot further.

2) Stay in SF for the longer term, and get started immediately learning the ins and outs of real estate investing and building a network.

#1 is good because I have more capital to get going, but #2 gives me an extra 2 years of experience and networking. What are your thoughts? Thanks!

Loading replies...