Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
3
Votes
Michael Robertson
  • Sales
  • San Marcos, CA
3
Votes |
11
Posts

Buy and hold: Back yard, or cross country?

Michael Robertson
  • Sales
  • San Marcos, CA
Posted

Hello everyone!

Super newbie here. I'm very very interested in buy and hold investing. As I start to put my long term plan together one issue is becoming more and more unavoidable: I live in the San Diego area and its hard(er) acquire property and to get cash flow going here!

So it seems I have a choice: I can start investing in a harder area (San Diego) where properties cost more and cash flow less, but where I know the area and am within driving distance of my rental properties. Or I can research and find a more favorable market far away to invest in where I know no one, but conditions will be more favorable.

What do you all think about buy and hold in your back yard vs buy and hold at a distance?

Which would be easier?

Which would be more profitable long term?

How does property management factor into all this?

Should I do a combination of both?

Are my underlying assumptions silly anyways?

I know you can be successful either way. I'm just trying to decide what would be best for me. I appreciate any thoughts you guys have.

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

404
Posts
421
Votes
David Hutson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Bartlett, TN
421
Votes |
404
Posts
David Hutson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Bartlett, TN
Replied

My two cents is that it's very difficult to find good local deals (in CA) so I have moved to out of state.  I have 14 rentals.  The first 6 were here in CA and my last 8 (in two years with one closing today) have been out of state.  The profits are higher away from CA.  I would prefer to buy local so I can manage and drive by my properties but it's not worth it financially.

It's not going to be the same for everyone, depending on comfort level, experience, finances/ability for down payment, etc.

Which is easier depends on how involved you want to be.  I find my out of state properties to be easier since I don't manage them and even with them being out of state the returns are higher.

Property management should be at the top of your list when considering a home to buy.  You buy the house once but deal with the property management co until the home is sold.  It will make or break you.  Wherever you buy, investigate property managers prior to buying.  Find a good property manager prior to closing.  You can find recommendations for wherever you buy on BP.

If you have the cash to buy down there and are willing to "hope" for appreciation then it can be great.  I recommend you figure out what the end state is before you start looking.  What are the reasons you want to own property?  Where do you want to be in 5 years, 20 years, etc.  Start with the end in mind.

Good luck.

Loading replies...