Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
3
Votes
Christopher Ward
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Austin, TX
3
Votes |
8
Posts

Which came first the live in 4plex or the cashflowing SF rentals?

Christopher Ward
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Austin, TX
Posted

So like many other starry eyed first time investors I have read and heard about I am looking to make my first real estate investment into a fourplex in which I will live in 1 unit and rent out the other 3. I am locked into my lease at my apartment for 8 more months so that will not be happening anytime in the immediate future but I am fairly certain that is the route I want to go. In the meantime however I have been hearing quite a bit about out of state, single family, turn-key rentals and have been wanting to maybe give these a try, as it is a much smaller investment and can get me started quicker. I know most of the pro's but only some of the cons to these turn key properties so I need to research this a little more.

My question is which one I should be focused on more? The turnkey properties since I can invest and get started with them now? Or the fourplex since it is going to be a much bigger and more important investment to my portfolio starting off? From a buying and leverage standpoint which one would benefit me more to buying first? I think if I purchase a cheaper turnkey property or 2 I may not look as lend-worthy (if that's a word lol) to banks and may get stuck with higher rates or be more likely to be denied if I already have a large loan or 2. Any and all opinions welcome!!

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6,500
Posts
3,173
Votes
Ali Boone
  • Real Estate Coach
  • Venice Beach, CA
3,173
Votes |
6,500
Posts
Ali Boone
  • Real Estate Coach
  • Venice Beach, CA
Replied

Hmmm...good question! For clarification, if you were to buy turnkeys, would you be focusing on particular areas or anywhere that is good? 

I think the answer lies in the cash flow of each option. How much would you anticipate making? The 4plex in Austin might be quite minimal, or negative, on the cash flow--but you could get an FHA loan and it's better than buying a SFR for yourself. But if you would only be looking at turnkeys in your area, those won't cash flow much either. Or if you look at turnkeys in various locations, the cash flow on those might be really nice and that income could help you move towards that 4plex. And as far as the loans, you should still be able to get loans if you grab a couple turnkeys. I'd confirm with an investor-specializing lender (can you get an FHA, if that's what you want, if you own the couple turnkeys).

Loading replies...