Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 16 years ago,

User Stats

619
Posts
75
Votes
Terry Royce
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Baltimore, MD
75
Votes |
619
Posts

Putting in contracts that don't allow contingencies

Terry Royce
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Baltimore, MD
Posted

I want to put an offer on a bank owned property. The listing states that there are certain adendums to accompany the contract. They state that termite and home inspections are for buyer's info only.

So my question is I want to get the inspections for my knowledge, but I don't want to spend the 300+ dollars if they are not going to accept my contact.

Is there any way around this? Or is there any way to tie up the property some other way?

Loading replies...