Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 17 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

30
Posts
0
Votes
David F.
  • Ontario
0
Votes |
30
Posts

Real Estate Agents Friend/Foe

David F.
  • Ontario
Posted

This is a question that I have been wondering for quite some time. I am starting out in real estate investing and assembling my team. My question relates to real estate brokers.

I understand that brokers are a great source of deals. But in reality, brokers are people too, and a good deal is a good deal. That being said, if a property is "such a good deal", then why doesn't the broker take that for himself? Why doesn't he/she scrape up the money to control the property, or get an investor to back him up? Wouldn't they make more money off of it that way, as opposed to a commission fee? So, are the deals that would be presented to me, are they high quality deals, or simply the deals that the broker simply couldn't do himself?

Take care,

THE HUN.

Loading replies...