Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 17 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

100
Posts
4
Votes
Mike Cartmell
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Colorado Springs, CO
4
Votes |
100
Posts

50% Rule for Lease Options

Mike Cartmell
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Colorado Springs, CO
Posted

If I purchase a house with intent of finding a tenant buyer to sell with a lease option, do I need to apply the 50% rule with this property. I am not planning on renting it, the term would be 1-3 years. The potential profit would be made applying the appreciation (3-5%) to the current market value over the term.

I am looking at finding a nice property with around 10-20k in equity and then selling by lease option. There is no way this would work if I applied the 50% rule. Is this doable or have I been wrongly guided by one of the gurus?

Thanks,
Mike

Loading replies...