Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago,

User Stats

139
Posts
89
Votes
Scott Pigman
  • Austin, TX
89
Votes |
139
Posts

Obligatory 2% Rule Post: Origins, 50% rule, and interest rates

Scott Pigman
  • Austin, TX
Posted

I believe that it's in the BP charter that every member is required to start a thread about either the 2% rule or the 50% rule at some time. So here's mine.

Does anyone know when and where the 2% rule was first stated? Was it first posited here on BP? Did William Nickerson write about it back in 1959? Did some guru come up with it while hanging out with his supermodel girlfriends on his yacht in the 80s?

I'm curious partly just out of general historical curiosity, and partly because I'm wondering if it can be tied to particular point in time, what the prevailing interest rates were then.

If you accept the 50% rule as being an accurate* approximation of expenses and ask the question, "how much rent would I have to charge to cover my expenses and my mortgage at x% interest?" then it looks like your rent would have to be about 2% of the purchase price when interest rates are somewhere in the 11-12% range. I believe that was the rate back in the early to mid 80s, so I'm wondering if that was when people started talking about a "2% rule".

At 4% interest you can cover expenses and the mortgage at about 1% rent/price.

*insert disclaimers about it being a law of averages over sufficient time and properties

Loading replies...