Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
3
Votes
Crystal Francis
  • Involved In Real Estate
  • Folsom, CA
3
Votes |
9
Posts

Sacramento market: 2% and 50% rules

Crystal Francis
  • Involved In Real Estate
  • Folsom, CA
Posted

Hi everyone! I'm new to real estate investing/BiggerPockets, and I'm excited to have found such a great resource and community. In reading the Beginner's Guide, the 2% and 50% rules have me pretty concerned about finding an investment property in my local real estate market (Sacramento area). As a new investor, I like the idea of purchasing a duplex to owner-occupy and ease into this new world of landlording, but it seems VERY difficult to find properties that meet these criteria.

I have been monitoring the local market by identifying properties that I would be interested in purchasing (based on area, size, price, etc.) and recording their sale price and monthly rental income.

2% rule

I'm finding that the range of monthly rental income/purchase price is around .61-.78%, which is much lower than the recommended 2%. Bummer.

50% rule

Even if I model a loan with 20% down (which I was hoping not to do to preserve cash), I'm finding the expected monthly mortgage payments range from 50% up to 64% of the expected monthly rent. If I believe that the expected expenses of the property will be about 50% of the monthly rent, then the properties I am considering would be cash flow neutral, at best. Even BIGGER bummer.

I'm interested to hear how many people adhere to the "rules" or whether you have developed your own criteria. I'm torn between wanting to get started already and not wanting to be a foolish first-time investor. Any input is much appreciated!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

812
Posts
432
Votes
Walt Payne
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Sebastian, FL
432
Votes |
812
Posts
Walt Payne
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Sebastian, FL
Replied

@Crystal Francis welcome to biggerpockets. In markets like CA people do several things. One is to revise the "rules", which are really just a rule of thumb. So you might use a 1% rule instead. And because you are accepting lower cash flow, usually close to neutral, you would carefully buy in neighborhoods where appreciation is likely and acquire equity through appreciation and mortgage pay down from the tenants. In theory you can raise rents and take the equity out as you go.

Another strategy is long distance investing. Which has it's own down side and risks. Or you could invest in notes, or one of many other REI related investments.

Loading replies...