Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago,

User Stats

12
Posts
1
Votes
Shalen Takaaze
1
Votes |
12
Posts

Buy lower priced property now or save for higher priced property?

Shalen Takaaze
Posted

Looking for advice as I'm starting my long-distance real estate journey. Since I am investing out-of-state, house-hacking and putting down the 3% downpayment is out of the question. My first option is to go for a lower priced investment property (approximately $100k) that needs minor cosmetic repairs while the other option is to raise private capital and save for a higher priced property ($300-400k) that I can also do cosmetic repairs to increase ARV. I am torn since the lower priced property would at least get my foot in the door and begin to build momentum while the higher priced property would be more desirable in location, condition, tenants, etc. I am more open to hard money lending at a lower price point and refinancing within 3-6 months, but at the $300-400k, I would rather go with a conventional loan and refinance at the 12 month mark. Any and all thoughts on this would be appreciated!

Loading replies...