Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Vandan Mehta
0
Votes |
3
Posts

First time investor in bay area

Vandan Mehta
Posted

Hello,

I am a first time investor and just started to look for the properties. I would like to start with local area before going out of state.  I read the bigger pocket guide and other forums too. Right now it is really hard to find the property even with a break even cashflow unless we go in outskirts. I spoke with couple of local agents and they suggested to stick with bay area because appreciation is better compare to other areas and improve the cashflow by refinancing and increasing the rent over time. So is it a good idea to buy a property at a good location with a negative cash flow and hope for a nice appreciation when the market recovers? It doesn't make sense to me to do a losing investment but I will appreciate if someone can share their thoughts or experience about this idea.  Thanks.. 

Loading replies...