Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

65
Posts
11
Votes
Benjie DeVera
  • Los Angeles, CA
11
Votes |
65
Posts

Los Angeles MFR

Benjie DeVera
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

If there's an MFR (2-4 units) in LA in which the total rental income covers PITI (principal, interests, taxes and insurance), wouldn't this still be considered a good deal?

Here are my thoughts:

1) I would build equity, get the tax advantage write-off, and appreciation of the property. On paper, it wouldn't necessarily have a cash flow (not maybe until after a couple of years as rents go up) but it's still self-sustaining.

2) I can personally manage the property as a landlord since it is close to where I live.

3) For maintenance and repair expenses, wouldn't my insurance cover big expenses?

Would like to hear input/thoughts from other investors who live or have lived in large & expensive metropolitan areas, where 1% or 2% rule isn't there.

Loading replies...