Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Goals, Business Plans & Entities
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

39
Posts
16
Votes
Kent Baltare
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
16
Votes |
39
Posts

Legal structure question- TN vs CA

Kent Baltare
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
Posted

Hello everyone, thanks for reading!

I was doing some digging on this topic but after a while of reviewing conversations that were close to what I was looking for I thought it made sense to post the question.

I am a Canadian living in California and I just purchased my latest investment property in Tennessee which is under construction to be completed late September.  Being a Canadian, this is my first US property purchase and I want to make sure I am setting up the asset under the right legal structure so I don't lose my shirt in event something goes wrong.

Questions:

a) I am thinking of setting up an LLC, but not sure of whether I am required to do this in TN (where the asset is) or CA? (where I live)

b) If this is a choice that is available to me, what's the best play here?

c) Come tax time, what will the difference be between me doing my corporate taxes in CA vs TN.

Also, any relevant referrals are appreciated and I apologize in advance if this has been covered somewhere I have not yet seen.

Thanks again for your time.

  • Kent Baltare
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    164
    Posts
    135
    Votes
    Naseer Khan
    • Attorney
    • Bay Area, CA
    135
    Votes |
    164
    Posts
    Naseer Khan
    • Attorney
    • Bay Area, CA
    Replied

    @Kent Baltare

    1) If you setup an LLC in TN to hold the property, you are still considered to be "conducting business" in CA because you living in CA and are a member of an out-of-state LLC. CA has very overreaching laws when in comes to out of state businesses. Thus, you would be on the hook for the $800 CA franchise tax fee.

    2) The best approach is likely going to be the following: Set up the California LLC and put the property in there. Then file for "foreign business registration" with TN so you are protected in that state.

    3) In the scenario above, you are on the hook for both CA and TN LLC franchise taxes and state taxes. An LLC does not pay corporate tax because it is treated as a disregarded entity or partnership for tax purposes so the income flows directly to the members.

    Feel free to reach out if you need a more detailed explanation. 

    Disclaimer: This response neither constitutes legal or tax advice nor establishes an attorney-client relationship. Inquirers must seek the advice of their own legal counsel prior to undertaking any course of action related to this inquiry.

    Loading replies...