Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Goals, Business Plans & Entities
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
70
Votes |
557
Posts

Best Entity for California Residents

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I'm trying to figure out the best entity for CA resident/investors that want to invest both in and out of state. I know a California LLC is required to pay 800.00 a year annual tax. I am already doing that with one LLC I own for a non REI business.

Are the California investors here using California LLCs, or perhaps Delaware Series or Nevada LLCs instead?

It looks like the Delaware Series is the way to go for multiple properties. But that I'd still have to pay the 800 per year to California because I reside here.

I am currently shopping for a good attorney, too.

~Matt

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

75
Posts
20
Votes
Greg Boots
  • Real Estate Attorney
  • Seattle, WA
20
Votes |
75
Posts
Greg Boots
  • Real Estate Attorney
  • Seattle, WA
Replied

Joe,

This strategy would certainly work if we were looking to protect liquid assets (stocks, bonds, cds, etc.) that really exist in cyber space. Unlike real estate activity with these other investments there is not a direct connnection with California.

A holding LLC is an excellent option when you are involved in real estate transactions in California. The Calfiornia LLCs are the enitites that are conducting business in California in the State, the Nevada LLC simply holds the membership interest (ownership) of those LLCs and is not doing business in California and thus does not have to file a foreign entity and be subject to the California Franchise Tax.

Loading replies...