Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Goals, Business Plans & Entities
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago on .

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Greg Johnson
  • Fresno, CA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Part-Time RE Investing: Adding a 3rd Partner

Greg Johnson
  • Fresno, CA
Posted

Hello,

I'd like to hear folks' opinions on adding a third business partner into the mix for part time RE investors.

About a year ago, my brother and I bought our first property (multi-family) held in an LLC that we each own 50% of. Having had a great first year, we've decided to pursue additional properties and grow our buy-and-hold landlording business.

At this point, we've reached a crossroads: we're discussing the cost/benefit of adding a new partner.

It seems that if we add a third partner, we benefit from additional capital contribution, reduced personal risk, fresh ideas, and a quicker time to creating a self-sufficient business (i.e., having business profits fund new properties). The most significant drawback is the management "cost": three approvals instead of two on all decisions and the resulting increased time required - we both have full time jobs and we really enjoy the flexibility that a two-person partnership offers (e.g., text message decision making). I'm having difficulty assessing if the quantitative financial benefit (faster growth, but with ownership dilution) exceeds the qualitative management cost.

Has anyone gone through a similar experience? How did/would you make such a decision? Appreciate any insights!