Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
1031 Exchanges
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago,

User Stats

2
Posts
2
Votes
Brian Morissey
  • Sacramento, CA
2
Votes |
2
Posts

Selling at a Lost

Brian Morissey
  • Sacramento, CA
Posted

Hi,

I am considering selling my rental property which I purchased for $380k 10 years ago and currently has a market value of $310k.  I am married with combined yearly income of  $150k+ .  I have 2 questions:

1) Are 1031 exchanges recommended only if investment/rental property sale generates income? In our case we are selling at a loss.

2) Should we hold on to our rental property that's under water(Sacramento, CA), or sell it at a loss and buy another one in another city where housing prices are appreciating faster(San Jose, CA)?  Which one is more favorable in terms of taxes?

Thanks in advance!

Brian

Loading replies...