Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
1031 Exchanges
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago,

User Stats

11
Posts
4
Votes
Samuel W.
  • Investor
  • Cleveland, OH
4
Votes |
11
Posts

1031 Exchange - Question

Samuel W.
  • Investor
  • Cleveland, OH
Posted

Hi all,

I have had a burning question that I have been wondering about 1031 exchanges.

It’s my understanding that the government gives you 45 days to get a new property under contract after you sell your initial property.

My question is, if that property falls out of contract then what are the rules/regulations about getting another property under contract by a certain timeframe?

How much leeway (time etc) does the government give you to find the next property if your original deal falls through.

I’m sure many of you have experienced this. Looking for some education before I explore a 1031 exchange in the future.

Thanks,

Sam

Loading replies...