Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 1 day ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3,617
Posts
3,127
Votes
Joe S.
#2 Innovative Strategies Contributor
  • Investor
  • San Antonio
3,127
Votes |
3,617
Posts

Our pictures of an empty house or a house with furniture better?

Joe S.
#2 Innovative Strategies Contributor
  • Investor
  • San Antonio
Posted

I have a property that I am about to sell. The house is in good shape, etc.
I got some really good pictures already almost appears like the house was staged with furniture. It is not staged that is the real furniture, etc.
Now that the house is empty would it be better to take brand new pictures or simply use the pictures I have? 
The Property is not local to me so I would need to send out a professional photographer.

  • Joe S.
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    225
    Posts
    147
    Votes
    Gustavo Delgado
    • Houston, TX
    147
    Votes |
    225
    Posts
    Gustavo Delgado
    • Houston, TX
    Replied

    use the pics you have. But if a realtor is going to list, have them hire and pay for new pictures

    Loading replies...