data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35987/35987f6b55a96fd657e23c984c72d712015d25ce" alt=""
20 October 2016 | 4 replies
I have a spreadsheet that will list a couple things, and I want to vary it up to see what combination will produce the most optimal results.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e2/689e21c5d4009841fedb0d7163808077837810f5" alt=""
28 October 2016 | 9 replies
These areas WILL produce a "deal" - - but what is the bigger picture.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e883b/e883bcb78de5628d84530c4139a9a01c55a8926c" alt=""
29 October 2016 | 8 replies
As I often say, a bad sponsor can ruin a great real estate deal, and a great sponsor can produce the best possible outcome when faced with adversity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae65e/ae65e8513463682434f81dac9c6363818c6c88ce" alt=""
22 October 2016 | 5 replies
@deonte singleton, if you want cash flow, sounds like best route would be seller backed financing....on cash flow producing properties.You will need to bring something to the table, Perhaps get a partner in that instance..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61f89/61f892fa5b00c85117c9232692fb740f824c14c0" alt=""
23 October 2016 | 1 reply
Just keeping the lower with existing debt in place -- $390k on a $1M+ unit, gives us a good chunk of equity we can then pull out to make improvements, increase the unit's value, and add income-producing-ADUs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b938b/b938b0309ff84f0c373525786ed3e82fd2db4c5a" alt=""
9 December 2016 | 39 replies
If you sell a certain amount with Keller Williams they stop taking commission on your sales so if you become a high level producer you start being able to keep a higher percentage of your overall commissions every time you sell more.If all you want is to be able to buy / sell real estate and save on commissions then you probably want to find a brokerage that has a flat fee per closing as a brokerage fee instead of a %.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5209/d52094a36b5febea3603b0903a9d0d085921cb78" alt=""
24 October 2016 | 6 replies
I expect that this online service would likely fall outside of those lenders' approved lists, at least for now.Also, this approach would produce a different physical end product than the traditional signature, stamp, and ID checking process.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30433/30433a60ea67682b642bd2495c46ff6c4259ebb9" alt=""
23 October 2016 | 1 reply
Am I barking up a wrong tree considering most of these properties would be producing net income for most of the owners?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c71f0/c71f0f90dc01d34c17e3dc50f570294ade47b6cb" alt=""
23 October 2016 | 4 replies
Does the following scenario make sense:Income-producing multifamily appraised at $100,000Seller willing to set up financing with the buyer for $20,000Having the RIGHT bank financing 80% or less of appraised value or approx. $80,000Will a bank require or want buyer's cash in the deal?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35d0d/35d0dc20573de59f51f52bb06761c6891729b8bc" alt=""
25 October 2016 | 13 replies
Telling potential tenants likely will produce the best long term results.