8 June 2007 | 10 replies
Just a few numbers to point out how you've got to be careful about playing the more-money-down game.
10 July 2007 | 7 replies
In Ohio if someone knows how to play the game they can stay in a home for over a year without a payment to the lender.
27 June 2007 | 16 replies
wow am i ever glad i found this forum before i bought my first rental i guess i have to play with these formulas more to get comfortable with analysing deals thx to all who posted and keep the advice coming!!
21 June 2007 | 4 replies
So, the whole redeption period topic doesn't come into play.
17 June 2007 | 50 replies
(Yes, I realize you didn't ask us to analyze the property per se, but you asked for a reasonable offer price, which is absolutely tied to what will make the property a good deal, which of course requires analysis.)Bottom line, if you are absolutely convinced that it is a good deal at 1.4M, then take it at 1.4M.Originally posted by "littleivy":I have lived here a long time and have seen my home increase in value from 275K to 1M in the 13 years since we bought it....and our first home, which we kept as a rental, has increased from the 195K that we bought it to being worth about 850K+.I also won the lottery the last time I played, so I figure I'll be a shoe-in for the next time I buy a ticket.Have you seen this graph?
21 June 2007 | 1 reply
When borrowing from a private lender you are buying for a fixed price a partner who has clearly agreed the role they will play with no strings.6.
3 October 2007 | 25 replies
and massive (time-is-of-the-essence) action plays a critical role in staying ahead of "competition". good luck and hope you have continued success.
30 January 2008 | 21 replies
Yet somehow, baseball players, teams, and the sport as a whole keep moving along and doing well.
15 May 2016 | 12 replies
I hope you come back and play by the rules from here on.Thank you,