I personally think it will allow me more revenue than I'm making now, and allow for easier access to investment deals down the road.

If I could borrow 75% of the 'non - SDIRA' portion (75K), could I essentially 'cash out' by paying off the 55K loan on the non - SDIRA portion and recapturing my initial 20K down payment so that I could re-invest it into another property?

@Jeff Neckonoff it really depends as those are two very investment asset classes and revenue generation models.

In return, they must pay 8% of gross revenues to Royalty and Marketing fees.

It is my understanding that the old school "Lonnie Deals" are essentially dead due to the Dodd-Frank regulations coming down the pipe.

(PS we will be consulting with an attorney about the entire business concept, but we need to generate a bit of revenue...

Hi Justin,The portion of the property that has been used as the taxpayer's primary residence should qualify for the tax-free exclusion of up to $250,000 if single and $500,000 if married pursuant to Section 121 of the Internal Revenue Code.I'm not sure about the rest of the property.

Essentially what you are saying is, the IRR = 14.57% of which I choose to allocate 3.37% to pay back/down the invested capital.

The IRS has essentially determined $500 as a threshold; however, you must keep a written policy of that being your decision of a fixed dollar amount.

Just because they are have a new vehicle to get a potential investment to market does not change the fact that these are investments and the CF portals make their money exactly like Mortgage broker does .. points for allowing the investment to be on the portal and normally some servicing revenue..