10 June 2016 | 20 replies
That eliminates the problem with pictures only showing the angle that someone wants you to see.
10 June 2016 | 22 replies
This is a long shot but another angle to look at it from.
10 June 2016 | 6 replies
The RV angle would be a plus, but if it doesn't work out we'll probably sell it for extra cash.
10 June 2016 | 5 replies
I know there's many angles here I can take but I'd like to know the least painful!
12 June 2016 | 5 replies
Especially being your first deal.That said, if it is an incredible deal and your margins are wide enough where you think you'll be able to absorb some bumps in the road, that is up to you.
17 June 2016 | 9 replies
Then it goes up from there to brand new double wides at $50-60K.
15 June 2016 | 12 replies
After browsing for a while (before posting in the member introduction section with my true name), I soon came to realize the authenticity of this forum as well as the generosity shown by members far and wide.
6 November 2019 | 17 replies
I would add that Springfield has wide variances from street to street.
22 June 2016 | 23 replies
They CAN be right occasionally, but more often than not the Zestimates are off by a pretty wide margin.
27 January 2017 | 14 replies
Even though the rule of 70% is widely, in parts like Socal closer to 80% is realistic but once you get to 90%, you're at high risk of unexpected expenses eating all your profit.You mentioned you the property has a value add potential - what is the value add specifically?