A landlord may not interfere with the installation of cable television facilities.Is this right?

If the contract says seller pays for title insurance then seller pays for title insurance.When you assign a contract, you are no longer a party to the contract and normally would not pay for any closing costs.

Nevertheless, I find it very troublesome the feds can push to modify existing, legal contracts because one of the partys is having problems.

The party giving away ownership is the grantor (they are granting title) The party receiving ownership is the beneficiary (they are benefiting)I know others have different views on the protection (or lack there of) a land trust may or may not provide.

So, I stopped by the apt. one day and the third "tenant": is there.

Got it for $45k, put $5k into it, sold it on an installment contract for $79k.

Tis’ the season and all, but I can’t say I have re-plumbed a house because I was installing a water heater?

Buy my calculation, somone paying $425,000 would be in the hole to the tune of $1500/monthWhich is not to say you couldn't find a buyer.Was you addition of the third unit done with proper permitting and zoning approval?

I really believe in being ethical where all parties involved come out in a win-win situation.

The only part I don't fully agree with is that you shouldn't worry about what to offer, or how to evaluate the property.