Ultimately it's "under the table" if not properly documented.

Funding each loan can also be arranged as a transactional loan, where funds are brought to the table and revert directly back to the lending entity by the seller of the property.

In most cases you will still have to put some cash on the table and not just rely on the equity of the owned property.

If he does need a large cash influx, you will need to find a private lender or JV partner willing to put up the money to bring to the table.

I came across this table on the census web site.

I decided the only that will make me valuable is by me bringing Non MLS / Off Market deals to the table that no one else has in my market will make me more of an asset to my investors as they have a million realtors that can make a billion offers for them same inventory.

As a novice to RE investing, this is a very important concept for me to understand, especially as I await for my first of many offers on the table to be accepted - at which point I will be scrambling to fund.

Why leave all that profit on the table?

thanks for that great info Kurt Heise its great you have a deal on the table, from what ive gathered that is the hard part

What I'm reading between the lines tells me that you are either going to leave money on the table or improperly account for some things that could mean a substantial underpayment of taxes.