Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
Results (10,000+)
Loc Nguyen Appreciation question.
1 August 2008 | 41 replies
Why would I borrow my own money = equity when I can borrow others peoples money.If I borrow from one property to buy another I'm putting more risk on the property I borrowed against.
Justin Butler Buying under market value
21 July 2008 | 49 replies
There is little to no risk of the house disappearing to another buyer if it was on the market for 260 days.
Dave Kennedy Buyer's Agent....confusion
2 July 2008 | 43 replies
Keep in mind that if you sign an agreement with a buyer's agent, and the agreement specifies that the agent is entitled to 3% of the selling price, and then you find a house where the seller is only agreeing to pay a total of 5% (2.5% for each of the agents), you will be responsible for paying that additional .5% out of your pocket.That said, you could probably negotiate this contingency beforehand, and I imagine that a lot of buyer's agents wouldn't actually make you pay the difference, but it *is* a risk.
Jason Schmidt can someone please explain this 50% rule to me?
9 July 2008 | 163 replies
Is is very easy to reduce or eliminate expesnses as well as risk when renting out a property.As investors we should always be looking into ways to eliminate risk as well as expenses.The first is to find a great not a good attorney a great one to handle evictions.When renting out cover your risks up front with huge deposits.don't rent to anyone your not 100 percent sure will care for the home and at the first sign of nonpayment of rent or not caring for the property give notice follow the rules and evict.If you give an inch to renters they will take a mile.You must not tolerate anything from your renters they are like small childern or puppies, always testing to see what they can get away with.If you let your puppy pee on the rug without punishment then it will get worse every time he gets away with it.If your renter is late serve a three day pay or quit immediately do not delay a minute......show them your serious about following the law and that you know what your doing.
Jim Sharp Hey Hey Hey from Colorado Springs!
30 June 2008 | 25 replies
Now I'm Master Leasing to get cash flow and down payments on RTO without much risk and definitely no negative cashflow.
Josh Carpenter Advice Please
29 June 2008 | 15 replies
Personally (and I think a lot of people here would agree), a return like that isn't worth the effort of having to manage the property (you could get a slightly smaller return from a savings account), and the big risk is if you have any deferred maintenance or unexpected expenses, at which point you could easily go cash flow negative.While I've seen a lot worse deals asked about on this forum, this one isn't particularly great...especially in this market where great deals are available on every corner.
Michael R. Assumable Mortgage Questions
3 July 2008 | 7 replies
What could I do to minimize some of my risk?
Jeff Fairchild Best contingencies to use
9 July 2008 | 7 replies
It keeps your risk very low.
Eduardo Fernandez Short Seller Credit Consequences?
10 July 2008 | 5 replies
Are there any other risks or negative information for the homeowner/seller?
Tracey B. Limiting management of 100 door apartment complex
3 December 2008 | 12 replies
3) in terms of risk/reward, how much do you think I could get for the NNN lease income on such a property - would my example of increasing the on-site manager's income from $60K to $110K be sufficient reward for the additional risk they take on with regard to vacancies and maintenance expenses?