Even though, the chart includes all type of properties, it is a good indicator of the current scenario.

I see more upward indicating factors for them than the others... the Gold Line being one of them.  

I have an unit that's built in 2014 and I basically haven't had to fix anything this year (knock on wood)I would say your comps are more in the $1,000/sqft range, especial for new construction in that part of MissionBuild in separate meters and have the tenants pay utilitiesA lot of signs indicate this is the top for SF market, that's another factor to consider.

He never gave the borrower any sort of indication that the debt was forgiven either.The note is well written.

Choosing to invest without first having the financial discipline to pay off bad debt is not a strong indicator of competent financial management.

Percentages (vs other properties) give us an INSTANT indicator of whether there are any obvious red flags, and keep us on track for what we REALLY want to know:- % Return On Investment!

That unit needs more work than the vacant side, his lease runs out in 5 months, and he'd indicated before that he's not renewing.

Property ASales Comp Value $200kCash Flow $6000 a yearCap Rate 3%Property BSales Comp Value $100kCash Flow $4000 a yearCape Rate 4%Now Property A has a lower cap rate than Property B, indicating it might be worth more than Property B.

For you to be asking this question indicates you may not be financially educated to the level of being able to comfortably invest.

But the term, "legal non conforming use" seems to indicate that I might be limited in what I can do with it.