Over the years, there have been many fights about who is financially responsible for what and who has to pay for repairs/maintain tenants.

I also remembered recently… Back then, each fighter fought multiple times to see who the overall winner was at the end of the night.Then it was more of just a bar fight.

Most importantly, I think about how every structural alteration, fix, and upgrade effects the men and women who would be fighting the fires in the buildings I own.

I wrote a blog post on this on my blog but quick summary is what happens when the whole building floods and there is a fight between the different carriers as to how much each one will pay out, or they discover that the by-laws were that they had to buy collectively  this is not a good place to be especially for a homeowner who just wants insurance to cover the darn loss.

sounds like a shake down. i would have let them take it back to HUD and let HUD take you to court and prove that you have less than he recommended % of minorities in your apartments. keep this in mind when dealing with a court situation. people in court, be it attorneys, judges, prosecutors or anyone are only people. they do not want to work any harder than you do. if you fight all the way to the end, that means they have to work. if you settle, they do nothing but collect. make them work. if they had an air tight case, they wouldn't have lowered the asking amount in the first place. make them work

Hmmmm, no again.This is getting harder, then what about having two ladies in title covering 7 properties who were fighting, buying a one half undivided interest from one owner, with a 100% note for that interest.

Now They are saying they want to fight the eviction and wouldn’t hand me keys.

The ability to declare adverse possession isn't simple and takes quite a long time to do so it isn't likely you would have to fight a squatter other than to kick him/her out.

You could either:1) Point out the error to your tenant, explain what your intention was, and ask that they agree to amend the lease to reflect what it should have been (if you both agree there’s no problem amending it), or2) If they don’t agree to amend it I would just charge the lower of the percentage or the dollar amount if you ever have to enforce the late fee because if you try to charge the higher amount I don’t see it holding up if the tenant objects and fights it.

Its the lobbyists that fight healthcare reform and minimum wage and labor laws and consumer protection laws and predatory lending laws etc etc that stack the system not only against the poor but also most average americans.