
3 March 2017 | 5 replies
Once you cross into this world, your costs of raising capital go up significantly.Another downside with having "money partners" take equity in a holding company is that they become owners of all assets of the company (and inherit all liabilities).You could accomplish your objectives by simply forming a joint venture with an individual money partner on a per-property basis.If you have not done so, give Steven Cohen and George Dubé's "Legal, Tax and Accounting Strategies for the Canadian Real Estate Investor" a read - it's and easily digestible primer on the subject.
1 March 2017 | 4 replies
Could someone please explain the pros and cons.

2 November 2018 | 12 replies
Analyze that situation objectively: the tenant has that much free cash to pay you, but is making late payments on other debt obligations?

6 March 2017 | 4 replies
A previous responder had explained that to me.

3 March 2017 | 12 replies
@Brian Barfoot there's a great book that explains the lease option process very well.

4 March 2017 | 8 replies
I know we've explained why a comp supplied was used or not used.
3 March 2017 | 7 replies
explain that the rents in the area have increased, but you would like for the tenant to stay.

5 March 2017 | 11 replies
NOT the bottom .. the bottom are trouble long term.. the top are usually the best tenants.let me explain a little and I am stealing this one from Chris Clothier.rents 600.. to qualify you need 3X that's 1,800 a month.. that leaves 1,200 for the rest of your bills. so they are living week to week on little upset and your not getting your rent.now take 1,200 rent 3X is 3,600 now they have 2,400 to live on for the month.. we all eat the same food pay basically the same in UTLS.. and gas is gas etc etc. who do you think long term will be more stable.

13 April 2017 | 7 replies
I would like for someone to be able to explain the cost to a new investor distinguishing needs vs preferences