Now that I have achieved far greater financial success then my parents ever could, know what, I tip generously based on service, averageing 20%.

One of them was just named one of "Forty under Forty" for their achievements in the state.So it's very possible, but it takes persistence.

It helps them achieve $100+ per door in cash return.

If they had achieved some higher level of being, they must therefore by definition have more harmony.IMO, the world as we know it is becoming more civilized.

That said, I've no doubt there are REO listing agents manipulating the foreclosure process by purchasing through proxys, using their insider position to achieve the winning bids.

If you pay attention to basic investing fundamentals, then whether you are buying higher or lower end properties, you should be able to achieve your objectives.

60% would be a long term goal, something I think could be achieved if marketed properly.Short term, if we had the house set up properly, any bookings at all would be a positive.

After Ifinished typing my post above the other night, I found myself logically going toward option 2 more, since it seemed cleanest, and it allowed for a complete separation of the assets consumed by each tenant, in order to track the depreciation independently of one another.At this point, I know I can make the final depreciation amountscome out the way I want them to, however what I was confused about is, what is the most acceptable practice in the industry for achieving that?

So to achieve this while developing a fluent wholesaling business.

and requires principal intervention via MM inventory to achieve regulatory requiremets for market stabilization, etc.