Flood argued that the lots were purchased for investment purposes and therefore the profits should be taxed as capital gains.

I am not arguing that it's some magic-wand and it's all roses and rainbows for any and all no matter how they do it.

@Scott Trench @Jimmy LieuI would argue that real estate is a pretty efficiently valued asset class.

If there are no layout changes or walls coming down/being replaced, I would argue that no permit is required. 

As an investor and realtor in FL, I would argue you are far better off with a Florida investment than in CT. 

I think you are arguing a problem that doesn't exist.

In fact, I'd argue, social media is purposefully designed to SERVE YOU as its master. 

If you paid above market price that is where some could argue it’s not wise as with owner financing you are either getting a good rate and bad price or bad rate and good price, typically both are not advantageous to the buyer

I would argue any aspect of the industry could be utilized as a side gig.

While I could argue there is value in that: more associates and seasoned partners, more paralegals and databases to reference from, there is also more office space typically in higher rent areas, more overhead, etc that you are paying for too.I would target the midsize real estate focused firms.