
30 October 2011 | 3 replies
I read your post on the forum, I would respond there, but I know how private these issues can be.But there are several options which could potentially help you out.There are a few programs which could help, one in which we could actually work with our lenders to see if they can approve an investor refinance loan. email me on [email protected]

20 November 2005 | 0 replies
Attention: Residential Building Owners of New York CityBeyond the Shelter....Opportunity for a Good Cause...A program that means more than assisting those less fortunate….It’s a humanitarian effort to prevent homelessness.Steady, On-Time Payments… each month with an initial three (3) months rent up front.We work closely with many New York City building owners day in, day out offering ‘Good People’ a two (2) year commitment to provide them with a roof over their head.This is not Section 8We need your Vacant Low to Moderate income apartments in all Five Boroughs of New York CityIf you have Vacancies you need to fill... please call one of our staff members.Principal Owners Only PleaseMichael Sweitzer, Managing DirectorHeritage Estates Commercial, LLC347.721.9838 Ext [email protected]

4 December 2005 | 0 replies
I have produced a 30-minute TV program that was shown on the local Aspen channel.

30 January 2006 | 1 reply
We offer a fly and buy program for our out of state clients.

24 November 2011 | 3 replies
With regards to severing the agreement earlier than 30 days or not; it probably isn't worth the potential disagreement over one month's management fees, and absolutely isn't worth it if you end up needing to involve a lawyer to settle any dispute.

8 February 2006 | 1 reply
We love people who get involved in the discussion, and would welcome your input.

9 April 2010 | 6 replies
If you want to hide the identity of the true owners, there are ways to do this using trusts, but it requires the involvement of several people--you cannot be both the trustor and the trustee for example.

20 February 2006 | 0 replies
While I was impressed with the information I received (it made sense and wasn't the typical "pie in the sky" BS) I would like to hear from those of you who may have already attended or had interaction with this program!

12 February 2006 | 2 replies
This mean that they can not invoke the "Due on Sale" clause just because the property transferred.Successfully executing a sub-to deal is VERY complicated and involves a ton of paperwork.

6 March 2013 | 13 replies
BUT there is at least one company out there that makes (creates) a distinction between the three and have three separate programs to offer: Lease Option for one or two years (no obligation to buy), Lease Purchase (rent for six months before having to close), and Rent-To Own (Tenant pays extra rent that is held until enough Option Consideration is saved up to do one of the other two programs).