I'm fairly new to the group.

Most investors require net proceeds of at least 84-88% of the fair market value.

It has great bones with prioritized fund clauses and other pro-landlord terms to help you in an eviction.I also suggest that you skim the CA fair housing info that you should be able to find on your county's court website.Lastly, I really like some clauses on Landlordology.com just search the site for lease clauses.Hope that helps.

What about this has to do with fair housing?

Part of the WC "bargain" scheme is that employees do not have to prove liability to be compensated for injury.  

A lot of them are getting to a point where you get the look and to some degree feel of the simulated material with the practicality of the actual material.I think SS appliances and granite counters will maintain some level of popularity long-term, because they last fairly well. 

Expenses: The 8% seems fair from PM.

By having this knowledge ahead of time, they could negotiate and explain their reasoning while also knowing how much margin of safety they were comfortable with purchasing at.KRW 150,000,000 represented a fair price for the propertyBut at KRW 110,000,000 (plus furniture) our investors were severely limiting their downside risk.They tenant would provide most of the upfront cost.

Does this sound like a fair offer, and/or what should I counter? 

As I stated, I am not worried if they do because I can evict fairly quickly and without an attorney.