Has anyone transferred their conventional financing held by the couple to just one person?

You don't have to pay a thing no insurance no taxes no maintenanceAnd to reassure you that I'm going to pay this bill on time I'll leave a quick claim deed in case I default, in escrowThe only thing you need to be willing to do if I take over your payments is to transfer the deed to me and keep the mortgage in your name.

However, the UPCA states that:"in the case of resale or transfer of a unit consisting of unimproved real estate, the capital improvement fee shall not exceed one-half of the annual assessments for general common expenses..."

Once the buyer is ready to cashout (in a few years) with in the agreed upon time, you pay your seller owner and transfer the title to the buyer.

Unless you see a recorded doc that transfers the property from the borrower to the lender, it's safe (relatively) to assume she owns it.  

Makes sense.It's starting to be pretty clear the DOT needs to be recorded after the transfer deed is recorded.  

Those have since been transferred back. 

Some my say never borrow from your retirement but I feels it's a good asset transfer. 

Seems like it would be nice to have money flowing in on first day of purchase. you prefer buying with no tenants because that is a variable you no longer have control over. a good landlord only rents to tenants who can pay rent, and can be collected from if you evict them. bad landlords put in tenants who barely make enough to cover rent+bills, and one slip up means they don't pay rent and get evicted. you also give up control if you take on someone else's lease, as the terms transfer to you. if the tenants are paying $1000 under market rent, and lease is for 3 years, you have to eat that $1000 cost until lease is up. technically, inheriting great tenants would be wonderful, but you never know if they are good or not

You will get the prorated rent for the month that you close and make sure their security deposits are transferred to you at closing as well.